The famous preacher, Henry Ward Beecher
entered his Plymouth Church one Sunday to get ready for his sermon.
He found a letter addressed to him so
he opened up to read it.
When he opened it up it only had one
word written on it in large letters – FOOL
He took the pulpit that Sunday and
addressed the issue of what seemed line an anonymous letter.
Beecher told his congregation- I have
known many of an instance of a man writing a letter and forgetting to sign his
name but I have never known of an instance where a man signed his name but
didn’t write the letter.
Well I hope you guys don’t think I am
such a fool today that you would address a letter to me like that.
Today we are going to look at Acts
6.
In today’s lesson we see a church
growing, a church growing so fast that they have growing pains.
We will find that it will take a church
that cooperates and works together to please God.
Back in 1957 the 1st Brethren Church of
Sarasota, Florida had a groundbreaking service.
Ordinarily, a church will get a few
shovels and certain people will turn over a few chunks of dirt.
But recalling the words of Jesus, "Take
my yoke upon you," this church decided to borrow an old one-horse plow and
harness two of their strongest young men to it.
The signal was given and the men PULLED… but nothing happened.
They strained at the harness, but they
were unable to pull the plow even an inch.
So then the entire Building Committee of the congregation took hold of the rope, and they PULLED. But the plow wouldn’t budge.
Even they couldn’t get the plow to
move.
Other church officers were added, and the Sunday school officers and teachers, and they PULLED… but still they couldn’t get the plow to budge.
Finally every member of the congregation who was present each took hold of the rope. With every member pulling together, the plow moved, the ground was broken.
That is a great example of how
congregations should do their work.
Congregational work with shared
responsibility is a must for the church to thrive and succeed.
But the Bible does give us examples and
commands to show us that there needs to be demarcations of roles and
responsibilities in the church.
I know in the game of football to be
successful some have to play WR, Some OL, Some DL and other LB.
You cant walk out on Friday night and
win if everyone plays the same position.
Each man must have a roll.
The same is true for the church. Whereas the work of the Church is for all of
us there are certain people marked out for a specific roll to play.
One preacher was quoted as saying God
Can move mountains but don’t be surprised if He gives you a shovel.
Lets start with a look at the first
verse in Acts 6
Acts 6: 1
1 Now at this time while the disciples were increasing in
number, a complaint arose on the part of
the Hellenistic Jews against the native Hebrews, because their widows were being overlooked in the daily serving of food.
1)
Problems can come from the best places
Sometimes problems in a church can come
from the best of all places and that is growth.
Sometimes in life things that we don’t
even think about can complicate our lives.
I know when Anna Grace was born our
family grew by only one person but it changed everything.
With the 3rd child we
officially became a van driving family.
I never thought I would be in the van club but I am.
Next thing you know she is mobile and
you cant turn your back on her for a second because she is all over creation.
The same could be true for a
church. Growth happens, new people come
in and problems arise that we never could expect.
I don’t know if the overlooking of the
Hellenistic Jews by the Hebraic Jews was intentional but whether it was or it
wasn’t – they still had a problem on their hands.
Growth often brings out hidden issues.
Here is something that we have to understand that
when a person is saved they are placed in the Church.
That is Scriptural and we have already looked at
that concept in the book of Acts.
Think of it this way – Noah’s ark may have been
stinky on the inside but it sure beat being outside in the water.
The same is true for the church – it may not be
perfect and we may have issues at time but it sure beats being out alone in the
world.
Growth may
not so much create the problem as reveal issues conveniently swept under the
rug.
With rapid increase comes administrative problems.
The problem Luke describes requires us to
understand that era. But it is emblematic of issues the church has always
faced.
This was a conflict between the Hellenists and the
Hebrews.
The term Hellenists
refers to those Jews who over the previous 500 years had spread throughout
the Mediterranean basin.
They remained Jewish, but spoke Greek and not
Aramaic.
Their diet
remained kosher, but with a Cyprian twist or an Athenian flair.
It was not uncommon for Jews, living abroad, to
make their way back to the mother country, especially in their twilight years.
As they would settle in Jerusalem, the husband
would die, leaving a widow to fend for herself often without the extended
family resources of those Aramaic-speaking Jews, here called the Hebrews.
Native speaking Aramaic Jews often discriminated
against Hellenistic Jews, whom the Pharisees held in utter contempt,
considering them second-class Israelites.
What is
more, ethnic groups tend to associate with those who share their language and
cultural background.
This division is seen in verse 9 of chapter 6, as the Hellenists had their own synagogues.
Then came Pentecost and thousands of Aramaic
speaking Jews plus hundreds of Hellenistic Jews became one in Christ.
However, conversion did not erase all their
prejudices.
The Greek speaking widows soon felt they were being
shorted. It was the Jewish practice was to take care of their own,
as there were no social security or welfare
programs.
In a society where women could not support themselves and, as Christians, they may well have
lost all support from the Temple, they were in need.
The church may have followed the precedents set in
Judaism, which had a double system of distribution to the needy.
The Jews had
a weekly dole for needy residents.
It was given out every Friday and consisted of enough
money for 14 meals.
There was
also a daily distribution.
It was for nonresidents and transients and
consisted of food and drink, which were delivered from house to house to the
needy.
It would be easy to imagine how some would be
overlooked, perhaps due to language or status.
It may have been intentional or purely an
oversight.
But the hurt
was the same.
2) The
problem did not turn into a bigger problem.
Acts 6: 2-7
2 So the twelve summoned the congregation
of the disciples and said,
"It is not desirable for us to neglect the word of God in order to serve tables. 3 "Therefore, brethren,
select from among you seven men of good reputation, full of the Spirit and of wisdom, whom we may put in charge of this task. 4 "But we will devote ourselves to prayer and to the ministry
of the word." 5
The statement found approval with the whole congregation
; and they chose Stephen,
a man full of faith and of the Holy Spirit, and Philip, Prochorus, Nicanor, Timon, Parmenas and Nicolas,
a proselyte from Antioch. 6 And these they brought before the apostles ; and after praying, they laid their hands on them. 7 The word
of God kept on spreading
; and the number of the disciples continued to increase
greatly in Jerusalem, and
a great many of the priests were becoming obedient to the faith.
Notice how the people reacted to this
issues.
Notice that the church continues to
grow and the word of God kept on spreading after this problem.
The Hellenistic widows did not go off
and form their own church.
Think about it from modern terms – we
tend to divide churches and form new denominations whenever we cant see eye to
eye.
Do you think from a modern perspective
they had good reason to divide up.
Think about it – the Hellenistic Jews
could have easily had the first church of the Hellenists down the road from the
first church of the Hebrew Jews.
But they didn’t do that, they toughed
it out together.
And here is the key component they
trusted their leadership to do something about it.
So many times we get seduced by popular
culture and want an answer immediately to our problems.
God doesn’t operate that way sometimes
– it takes time, discernment and patience when dealing with an issue like we
see in our text today.
They stay unified and they don’t
fracture.
3) The
problem brings perspective.
The apostles focus on what is important
when they deal with this issue.
I find this story strikingly similar to
the story of Moses.
Exodus 18: 14-23
14 Now when Moses' father-in-law saw all that he was doing for the people, he said, "What is this thing that you are doing for the people ? Why do you alone sit as judge and all the people stand about you from morning until evening ?" 15 Moses said to his father-in-law, "Because
the people come to me to inquire
of God. 16 "When they have a dispute, it comes to me, and I judge between a man and his neighbor and make known the statutes of God and His laws." 17 Moses' father-in-law said
to him, "The thing that you are doing is not good. 18 "You will surely
wear out, both yourself and these people who are with you, for
the task
is too heavy for you; you cannot do it alone. 19 "Now listen to me: I will give you counsel, and God be with you. You
be the people's representative before
God, and you bring the disputes
to God, 20 then teach
them the statutes and the laws,
and make known to them the way in which
they are to walk and the work
they are to do. 21
"Furthermore, you shall select
out of all the people able men who fear
God, men of truth, those who hate dishonest gain ; and you shall place these over them as leaders of thousands, of hundreds,
of fifties
and of tens.
22 "Let them judge
the people at all times ; and let it be that every major dispute
they will bring to you, but every
minor dispute
they themselves will judge. So it will be easier for you, and they will bear
the burden with you. 23 "If
you do this thing and God so commands you, then you will be able
to endure,
and all these people also will go to their place
in peace."
Jethro the father in Law of Moses comes and sees
Moses in the wilderness with the Israelite people.
He sees something that disturbs him. Moses is doing way too much.
He tells Moses to delegate some authority.
Train other people at this job – and pick
trustworthy people.
You see the precedent – Moses needs to be focused
on the task of leading Israel and not being distracted by other problems.
Moses cannot be caught up in every dispute among
the people.
The situation in the church was a little
different. The problem arises and they
need a solution.
Training must take place. In the time of Moses as well as in our time.
The Apostles must keep their perspective straight.
Their primary purpose is to preach and minister the
word.
The Apostles have a roll to play and they must stay
on task. They cannot get caught up in
this dispute because the Gospel call is urgent.
In other words one overarching organizational
principle for a church should be driven by this – the Word of God must be
taught and proclaimed.
I think the perspective of the Apostles is 100
correct.
It is two fold:
1)
the needs of the flock is important to them.
2)
The ministry of the word is important to them.
Heed to the flock:
The apostles show us a key to
leadership and that is listening to God and to God's people.
In his book Life Together, Dietrich
Bonhoeffer wrote, "The first service that one owes to others in the
fellowship consists of listening to them. Just as love for God begins with
listening to His Word, so the beginning of love for the brothers is learning to
listen to them. It is [because of] God's love for us that He not only gives us
His Word but also lends us His ear."
In the church at Jerusalem you can look at the
church make up as the following:
The Apostles – served as the Evangelist – spreading
the word
The deacons – were the hands and feet of the church
– serving needs of the members.
Eventually we will learn in Acts 15 that the church
in Jerusalem has elders.
The elders are the pastoral leaders of the church.
If someone asks you if you have pastors – you
answer them yes- they are elders.
The same office in the New Testament is the
elder/presbyter/bishop/ pastor.
They are one in the same office. Each term describes a roll of an elder.
Elders of course provide pastoral care for the
sheep and also safeguard doctrine. They
make sure the flock develops spiritually.
That seems to be the primary role of an elder in
the New Testament – pastoral care – spiritual development and doctrinal purity.
Elders were also to teach – that is why some
churches have a teaching elder that acts as a minister in their role. We see that with Peter the apostle who was
also and elder.
The passage today though gives us the prototype of
our deacons today and their qualifications and rolls.
"Therefore, brethren, select from among
you seven men of good reputation, full of the Spirit and of wisdom, whom we may
put in charge of this task."
Therefore, because the duties are incompatible and one has the strongest claim on us.
Therefore brethren, or those of like
faith in Jesus Christ as Lord.
Therefore brethren select, look out
among you, inspect yourselves. There are five requirements listed in this brief
verse.
They concern the infant church
establishment of the office of deacons.
The first qualification is that deacons are to be known members of the local congregation.
The first qualification is that deacons are to be known members of the local congregation.
They were selected from among
themselves.
Second they were to be men, not in the vague
sense of persons but in the specific sense of males.
Certainly women have vital roles to
fill (Titus 2:3-5).
In the early church women such as Dorcas,
Lydia, Phoebe, Priscilla and Phillip's evangelistic daughters were greatly used
by God.
Nevertheless God's design for the set
aside deacons of the church is men.
A third requirement is that they be men of good reputation.
The Greek word is ma'rtus (from
marturomenous) meaning witness.
The word can mean a person about whom a
good witness is given and also a person who is a good witness.
The apostles wanted people of character
who were involved in communicating Christ' love to others.
A fourth prerequisite is that they be full of the Spirit. They must be fully yielded to His control in every area of their lives.
This would be evidenced by the Spirit's
sanctifying influence as well as by His giftedness.
They were also to be full of wisdom.
Men competent concerning the spiritual
priorities of life, and also qualified to deal wisely with a situation in which
there are many factors to consider.
These are men that apply biblical truth
to everyday life situations.
Men of heavenly prudence knowing how to
spiritually act and react to life.
The apostolic plan found approval and
seven men were selected. That all are Greek names suggest they were Hellenists.
If true it was a demonstration of
loving unity. Since the Hellenists felt slighted men are appointed from among
themselves to rectify the situation.
Division was avoided and Satan's attack was
thwarted.
This passage also teaches how deacons are selected as well as their qualifications. The congregation is to nominate scripturally qualified men.
The qualifications for leadership in
the church have not changed. We can do church work without them, but not the
real work of the church.
That is why our church government is
such as it is.
It is set up to be two fold – the
safeguard and care for the flock and to the ministry of the word – the outreach
and teaching of God’s word to the community.
4) The
problems bring about prosperity and unity
I like good endings to stories. This passage this morning ends well.
It ends with the church being unified
and working toward the goal.
The church is only held up in its work
momentarily but each member saw what was at stake and got back to work.
So many problems in churches are just
simple misunderstandings.
People loose perspective and they think
they are bigger than the whole, they even forget that the Gospel’s proclamation
is bigger than their problems.
The
story is told about a small, country church where the pastor called a special
meeting of the congregation to approve the purchase of a brand new chandelier.
After some discussion pro and con, an old
farmer stood up and said, "Buying a new chandelier may seem like a good
idea to you, but I’m against it for three reasons.
First
of all, it’s too expensive and we can’t afford one.
Second,
there isn’t anybody around here who knows how to play one. And third, what we
really need in this church is a new light fixture."
Many
of our problems are the same way – we just don’t listen to each other – we
don’t give one another the benefit of the doubt.
I
definetly think the early church put each other’s feelings first before their
own.
I
want to end with this thought and this is something near and dear to me.
And
this is training the next generation of God’s men and women.
I
will say that this is a place the modern church is failing miserably. We are stuck in a rut of what has been passed
down in many American churches and it isn’t working.
More
and more churches are having a hard time finding deacons, elders and ministers.
Why
is that so? We are not training young
men to desire these offices.
Most
young ladies have never considered committing themselves to the training of
this next generation through bible class teaching or mentoring.
We
need to look to pass on our faith.
The
true mark of spiritual maturity is being able to teach others. How many churches are turning out adult
people that can teach others?
Lets
be honest about this issue- I believe we must change – not some type of liberal
change – I am talking about a commitment change.
The
U.S. standard railroad gauge (distance between rails) is four feet,
eight-and-one-half inches.
Why such an odd number?
Why such an odd number?
Because that’s the way they built them in
England, and American railroads were built by British expatriates.
Why did the English adopt that particular gauge?
Why did the English adopt that particular gauge?
Because
the people who built the pre-railroad tramways used that gauge.
They in turn were locked into that gauge because the people who built tramways used the same standards and tools they had used for building wagons,
They in turn were locked into that gauge because the people who built tramways used the same standards and tools they had used for building wagons,
which
were set on a gauge of four feet, eight-and-one-half inches.
Why were wagons built to that scale? Because with any other size, the wheels did not match the old wheel ruts on the roads.
So who built these old rutted roads?
The first long-distance highways in Europe were built by Imperial Rome for the benefit of their legions.
Why were wagons built to that scale? Because with any other size, the wheels did not match the old wheel ruts on the roads.
So who built these old rutted roads?
The first long-distance highways in Europe were built by Imperial Rome for the benefit of their legions.
The
roads have been in use ever since. The ruts were first made by Roman war
chariots.
Four
feet, eight-and-one-half inches was the width a chariot needed to be to
accommodate the rear ends of two war horses.
Maybe "that’s the way it’s always been" isn’t the great excuse for not changing that some people believe it to be.
Maybe "that’s the way it’s always been" isn’t the great excuse for not changing that some people believe it to be.